| Tera-Probe™
for sensitive, high-throughput oligonucleotide searches
Tera-Probe™ (pdf
brochure)
combines the performance of Tera-BLAST1 with efficient
Smith-Waterman alignment methods to identify oligonucleotide sequences
across
a genome.
Tera-Probe exceeds NCBI BLAST2 sensitivity and matches
Smith-Waterman3
results, yet offers much greater throughput.
Both DeCypher® and CodeQuest™ biocomputing systems process
Tera-Probe faster than sixteen thousand individual CPUs running
Smith-Waterman, making these solutions ideal for research teams
designing microarray probes, mapping SNP databases and designing
RNA interference experiments
Selecting Optimal
Microarray Probe Sequences
Comparing short sequences to a
genome database is essential for minimizing
non-specific
hybridization
in microarray probe design. Tera-Probe offer significant advantages
compared to other oligo search methods.
Smith-Waterman
- Often
used to screen potential probe sequences, as it comprehensively
explores all possible pairwise alignments to select an
optimal local alignment.
- Smith-Waterman software (ssearch) is slow
even on fast CPUs, with processing limited to 20
million
cell comparisons
per second per CPU.
NCBI BLAST
- Uses heuristic
shortcuts
to focus on anchor regions which share some core
similarity, resulting in faster searches
at the expense of sensitivity.
- May miss hits when multiple short gaps
or mismatches
occur between anchor regions
Tera-Probe
- Processes oligonucleotide search pipelines
at 330 billion cell comparisons per second, or 16,500x faster
than Smith-Waterman on 1 CPU.
- Requires
only
the space,
power
and cooling of a single workstation or server
- Can be scripted into your analysis pipelines
- Forces the entire oligo query to align
to local target loci to ensure that all
potential hybridization sites are examined
- Matches
the sensitivity of Smith-Waterman software
- You can employ a custom scoring
matrix to establish finely tuned scoring for
matches and mismatch
penalties
- Available with DeCypher Tera-BLAST and included with the CodeQuest
workstation

Figure 1. Smith-Waterman (ssearch) was verified on a single
CPU to compare 20 million cells per second.
A single DeCypher Engine system compares 330 billion cells per second,
for 16,500x the performance.


Figure 2. Comparing 10,000 oligonucleotide
sequences
(30-mers) to Unigene Mouse using DeCypher and GeneMatcher 
A DeCypher system with 4 cards and 4 CPUs compares 10,000 oligos
to Unigene mouse with Tera-BLAST in 1.5 hours. This requires 6
hours on a Paracel GeneMatcher2 system with 9 boards and 9 CPUs.
Due to improved gap handling at the ends of each alignment, Tera-Probe
identifies an additional 9,000 unique hits missed by GeneMatcher.
References
- Luethy et al. Hardware and software systems for accelerating
common bioinformatics sequence analysis algorithms. Biosilico
2(1), 2004
- Altschul, SF, et al. Basic local alignment search
tool. J Mol Biol 215(3), 1990.
- Pearson, WR. Effective protein
sequence comparison. Methods Enzymol. 266, 1996.

Contact
a TimeLogic account executive today to learn more about
Tera-Probe today!
Download Complete Tera-Probe brochure |